Prediction of Jacob Fearnley [74th] vs James Kent Trotter [176th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L W L W
Form
L L W W L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Fearnley 1 - 0 Trotter
They have played 2 sets in total, with Fearnley winning 2 and Trotter winning 0. The last match between Fearnley and Trotter was at the Canberra Challenger, 01-01-2025, Second, Hard with Jacob Fearnley getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jacob Fearnley | 1 |
| James Kent Trotter | 0 |
| Fearnley | Stats | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (14-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (9-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 74 | Ranking | 176 |
| 73 | Highest Rank | 173 |
| 23 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 3 |
| 76% (87-27) | Career Total W/L | 59% (99-68) |
| $443,455 | Career Prize Money | $79,295 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jacob Fearnley
Player
James Kent Trotter
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:12:2 | Average Match Time | 1:12:2 |
| 60% (29/48) | 1st Serve % | 63% (41/65) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (26/41) |
| 79% (15/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 45% (29/65) | Return Points Win % | 23% (11/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jacob Fearnley vs James Kent Trotter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fearnley 1 - 0 Trotter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fearnley has won 45.06% of points on their second serve, while Trotter has won 50.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fearnley, in recent form, has won 43.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Trotter has won 41.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.08% and 20.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fearnley has saved 62.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trotter has saved 60.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fearnley has won 75% of matches played (W/L 51/ 17), with Trotter winning 63.64% (W/L 42/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fearnley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 82% (W/L 46/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1). Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 37/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Fearnley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 86.05% of matches (W/L 37/ 6), where as Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.42% of matches (W/L 39/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fearnley winning 1 times and Trotter being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fearnley winning 2 and Trotter winning 0. The last match between Fearnley and Trotter was at the Canberra Challenger, 01-01-2025, Second, Hard with Jacob Fearnley getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fearnley and Trotter have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fearnley winning 0 times and Trotter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fearnley winning 0, and Trotter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fearnley has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.21 while Trotter has played against players with an average rank of 179.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fearnley has won 85% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trotter has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fearnley has converted 27.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trotter has converted 29.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Leo Borg
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tristan Boyer
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijs Boogaard
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
James Duckworth
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Jacob Fearnley
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
James Kent Trotter
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
6
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
James McCabe
59%
(
78 of
133)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
129)
7
Aces
15
10
Double Faults
5
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
53 of
74)
53%
(
29 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
32%
(
42 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
45 of
129)
136
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(9) 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Ryan Seggerman
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
105)
6
Aces
23
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fearnley vs Trotter?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fearnley Vs Trotter is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76% (87/27) | Win/Loss | 59% (99/68) |
| 70% (185/81) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (215/171) |
| 57% (1403/1059) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2022/1830) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.73 |
| 538 | Aces Total | 1375 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 455 | Total Double Faults | 486 |
| 1:24:37 | Average Match Time | 1:38:29 |
| 216.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 243.96 |
| 61% (4289/7025) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6535/11029) |
| 73% (3152/4289) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (5012/6535) |
| 51% (1396/2736) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2308/4494) |
| 45% (353/792) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (342/883) |
| 42% (3059/7346) | Return Points Win % | 36% (4016/11076) |
| 78% (84/108) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (97/165) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (19/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (44/81) |
| 78% (25/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (35/54) |
| 96% (73/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (85/76) |
| 4% (73/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (85/9) |
| 41% (41/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (82/23) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jacob Fearnley
View full predicted draw for Fearnley in Barcelona
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
